Feet Kissing / Licking is more than fetish—it’s the ultimate statement of belonging. We explore the deep history and the sensory hurdle of this profound act. The question is whether submission is humiliation or elevation. We dive into the Dialectic of Humiliation to prove why this powerful gesture requires acknowledged hierarchy and complete, earned consent.
Kinksters and Smut-Hounds: MasterMarc is back.
The last two years have been rough – personal, familial, and health-wise. Real Life demanded a lot from me, and yes, the KINKFINITY frequency took a hit. But the dry spell is over. The Master Machine has been serviced, the batteries are charged, and I am committed to bringing you more regular deep-dive Kink topics.
Today, we’re taking it all the way down to the floor. We’re talking about feet—the kissing, the licking, the ultimate physical submission. Let’s be direct: This is not about foot fetish; this is about a POSITIVE AND PROFOUND STATEMENT.
After learning to switch off that ticklish feeling in my head, I personally find a good foot licker to be magnificent. It’s super relaxing, one of the best foot massages. But that’s not the real point. The foot kiss or lick is the clearest physical declaration of an acknowledged hierarchy – a symbol steeped in history and tradition.
The Ultimate Impact of the Foot Kiss
Even though Wikipedia only traces the foot kiss as a sign of submission back to the Middle Ages, the documented origins of Proskynesis (ancient Greek: proskýnēsis) reach back to the Persian Empire, where this gesture of reverence, homage, and deepest submission is attested. We find this total prostration even among the Ancient Egyptians: Representations exist showing subjects throwing themselves into the dust before the Pharaoh. Interestingly, there are academic studies analyzing why these acts of humiliation are so rarely seen in official depictions.
The choice of feet as the target of reverence or a kiss is deeply rooted in cultural, hygienic, and symbolic hierarchies. Firstly, the feet are the lowest point of the body, the farthest point from the head—the seat of intellect and dignity (we crown heads, after all), and in some cultures, even the soul. By performing the act, you clearly demonstrate submission, as you bring the counterparty’s lowest point up to your eye level.
Furthermore, feet, which touch the ground or historically walked through dust and dirt, are often seen as the dirtiest body part. I personally would label a different body part as such, but kissing the ass also holds a similar symbolism to kissing the feet, though on an even more intimate level. This manifests in other gestures of submission like prostration, the kneeling or foot fall, or even kissing the ground the dominant person walks on, or the hem of the superior’s garment.
In the realms of the ancient Orient, the gesture was common. But even then, there were those who refused the gesture toward rulers. After Alexander the Great conquered the Persian Empire, he, seeing himself as more the Monarch of Asia than the King of Macedon, wished to introduce this customary Persian court ceremonial throughout his realm. Yet, his Greek and Macedonian companions refused the Proskynesis. They argued that the gesture belonged only to deities and violated the dignity of a free man.
However, because BDSM slaves are by their own free decision NOT free men in the ancient sense, there is no reason to reject Proskynesis. It is an act of free will. (By the way, this resistance led to a break between Alexander and his court historian Callisthenes, who was subsequently arrested and executed during the next convenient opportunity, the Page Conspiracy.)
The foot kiss, even concerning the Pope, was a typical gesture of submission extending to the highest secular circles. Yet, it was also a means to an end—the political Dialectic of Humiliation in its purest form. The gesture of humiliation by King Barbarossa—when he kissed Pope Hadrian IV’s feet and thereby bowed to the spiritual authority—was the necessary ritual price that, in return, made him the most powerful secular man (Emperor) through his coronation.
We Masters cannot offer an Imperial Crown, but isn’t it also elevating for a Slave to be the Slave of a respected and revered Master?
Clearly, even if it is not humiliation in the negative sense, it involves overcoming a hurdle initially. Our feet may not be as dirty as they were in the past due to shoes, but the shoes often create a more special, intense taste. Actively accepting this taste of one’s Master certainly involves overcoming a barrier for many. It is a form of humility of the senses; the Slave is asked to take in something “unclean” from their Master (like urine, sweat also belongs to this category in our society).
This act is made all the more intimate because it is a gesture that, when witnessed by others, cannot be misinterpreted at all. It is arguably one of the clearest signs of submission one can show. And when you recognize that a Boy performs it with utter devotion and a good feeling, it is one of the most sublime feelings a Master can have.
Humiliation vs. Elevation: The Positive Mark of Belonging
I mentioned humiliation earlier, as many see kissing feet as humiliating, but is it really? Humiliation always sounds so negative. But if one interprets the gesture as a positive sign, then it is not humiliation, but rather the acknowledgement of the counterparty as a superior personality.
This is precisely where the Dialectic of Humiliation applies: It is not a sign of the Slave’s humiliation, but much more the Master’s elevation. For if it were humiliation for the Slave, it would mean he doesn’t accept the hierarchy and doesn’t see the Master as superior. It is exactly then that we would have to seriously doubt whether the Consent—which I require for every Slave-Master relationship—is truly given.
The prolonged duration at the feet of one’s Master—or even the extensive licking of them—is, in contrast to the short, ritualistic gesture, no longer merely a sign of pure submission, but a deep commitment of belonging. This intimate service, which manifests the acceptance of dominance, is, however, also a commitment for the Master.
Just as in the Middle Ages, when vassals kissed the feet of their liege lord, the lord in turn was responsible for the protection of his vassals. This included both military and legal protection. This is also our responsibility as Masters. While we do not provide fiefs, we grant the safe environment—the dungeon, the toys, and the clear boundaries—so that the Slave life can even be lived.
The duty of “fidelity” was understood even then as mutual loyalty. The same applies to BDSM enslavement. It is and remains a give and a take. Both sides serve, simply in their very specific ways.
Dear Masters, please do not forget this. Because True Submission must be earned by taking responsibility for the Slave’s protection. Only the deserving Master has the right to have his feet kissed—because true Dominance is always a Service.
Then your Slaves will gladly lick your feet, or at least willingly overcome the hurdle FOR YOU, even if they don’t enjoy the taste. 🙂
